Text Size
   

The Healthcare Debate

Healthcare & The Oil Spill

It appears that Obamacare has struck in unforeseen ways.

While President Obama, Speaker Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Reid spent a year jamming down our throats an unworkable and unwanted healthcare overhaul, enforcing safety regulations on oil rigs was ignored.

Clearly BP was the major player at fault in the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion and subsequent oil spill. They ignored several safety concerns to speed up the oil drilling and retrieval process. The result is still uncertain except that environmental damage will be significant.

And what of the environmental groups who chased the oil drillers into extremely unsafe waters? Did their responsibility end there? Why didn’t they follow up on BP’s safety violations?

But the government made the safety regulations and was responsible for their enforcement just like they enforcement traffic speed laws. Adequate inspections and enforcement are critical.

Instead, for over a year they were completely absorbed with promoting their healthcare agenda. They took their eye off the ball. They did what they were not supposed to be doing and did not do what they were supposed to be doing.

Something needs to change to prevent this type of collusion from happening again. We need an independent party involved.

It is time to let private groups, similar to Underwriters Laboratory but having industry specific knowledge, enforce safety regulations. Underwriters Laboratory is a highly regarded “independent, not-for-profit product safety testing and certification organization” that has been testing products for over a hundred years. Their reputation far exceeds that of any governmental unit.

They can charge the oil companies a mandatory fee for service to perform inspections, grant certifications and report on safety practices of oil companies. Then concept can be extended to other areas, like to replace the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

President or Insurance Salesman?

It seems that we have an insurance salesman instead of a president. Perhaps Mr. Obama wants to start his own insurance agency when he retires, which at this rate will certainly be in January of 2013.

He has learned all about premiums, pre-existing conditions and deductible, preventative care and emergency room visits. Soon we will know if ambulance coverage is included.

And a dimwitted Congress is, in large measure, standing right there with him nodding their assent to enacting legislation beyond their constitutional authority instead of performing the regulatory functions they are entitled and required to perform which would provide immediate relief in many cases.

Isn’t is great to know that Mr. Obama is spending so much time on such insurance when 85% of the citizenry is basically satisfied with their coverage? Polls show that more than half the country does not want this type of healthcare legislation passed.

And now Mr. Obama touts his health scare reform as something that will create jobs! What is “Wrong-Way Barack” smoking?

As blogged previously, the free market is not the culprit. It is the answer. With just a minimal amount of regulation it will offer every conceivable choice. The more government gets involved, the fewer choices will be offered. It will not be pleasant.

Now that Mr. Obama knows all about insurance, his agency should do well. Wouldn’t it be great if he starts selling property and casualty insurance too?

We can hardly wait.

 

Governmental Healthcare Will Bankrupt The Nation

Besides being unconstitutional, creating a government run healthcare system now is like a family nearing bankruptcy buying a houseful of new furniture. Let's see...The national debt is setting new record highs with every tick of the clock at the rate of $2 million per minute. The federal government's annual deficit is $1.4 trillion.

Have we lost all our sensibility? The federal government has overpromised Medicare and Social Security, benefits it cannot deliver. The system now spends more money than it takes in. The federal government wants to take over healthcare to hide its incompentence by the use of a "shell" game.

The federal government is promulgating a scam. They will tax the People for several years before the benefits begin. This, they claim is fighting the deficit. However, when the benefits commence many forecast the cost will consume all the nation's budget. Is this administration trying to bankrupt the country or healthcare? And, who wants the IRS being the enforcement arm of a healthcare program?

Congress and the President claim they can glean $400 billion by cutting waste and fraud. Then why haven't you done so? What are you waiting for? This has gone on for years with no action? And cutting Medicare by $622 billion, according to the President's mid-year budget, will surely ration care for the elderly, care that was promised to them.

In a supreme irony, those who scream the loudest to “keep laws off my body” (abortion) also are screaming the loudest in support of nationalized healthcare that would take care of their body.

Be that as it may, the solution for those needing healthcare insurance will not be solved by a federally financed option. What is the answer? There are several actions that would alleviate this crisis.

Why not just leave our money with us in the first place instead of using a healthy portion of our taxes to pay government employee wages, benefits and workspace to create and implement policies to collect, count, store, use, distribute and track our taxes By keeping more money in our pockets we can use that to buy our own health insurance just like we do our car insurance. Choose your deductible with varying degrees of coverage and affordability that fit your needs and wants.

Medicare and Medicaid pay charges at reduced rates, passing huge costs to private insurance policy holders thereby making insurance more expensive. If more people were covered with private insurance, reimbursement would be faster and more reliable allowing physicians to maintain smaller staffs and help to hold down their costs. But now “Wrong-Way” Barack and Congress will surely make it worse by taxing insurers (that means higher premiums for the insured) to help buy insurance for the uninsured! This is forecast to add $800 annually for the cost of private insurance. And they want to fine those who cannot afford insurance (somehow they are supposed to find the money to pay the fine). There is nothing in the Constitution that allows any of these actions.

Government should do its job “to make regular” (regulate) the purchasing of health insurance across state lines, develop “standards of care” as a measure towards tort reform. Non-profit insurance companies already exist that will insure those with pre-existing conditions. Government could also do much researching, educating and promoting use of natural remedies instead of forcing everything through the FDA. Of course, big business will fight this…but it will help to hold down healthcare costs.

The sad truth is that Democrats are refusing to pass these ideas because they may lessen the need for the gigantic power grab they envision. They want big government. And if the Republicans so strongly believe in these ideas, which would indeed prove meaningful, why didn't they pass them when they were in control of Congress?

The American public deserves better leadership.

   

Government & Proposed Healthcare Takeover

Why should the federal government stay out of providing healthcare?

First of all, it has no constitutional authority to provide healthcare despite assertions made by “Wrong-Way” Barack, Ms. Pelosi and the rest of their pompous colleagues in the federal government including the Supreme Court's decision of Steward Machine Company v. Davis in 1937. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution is very clear. It does not give Congress the power to provide healthcare and citing the “general welfare” clause merely contradicts the Founding Fathers as cited in various places on this website.

Second, make no mistake, the government’s plan to enact sweeping healthcare legislation will lead to a dramatic failure of our healthcare system, both in terms of higher costs and reduced services. Guaranteed.

The government is the largest payer for healthcare services. It has already failed to restrain healthcare costs because it is at the root of driving up costs. So what has now changed to alter this? Their upcoming legislation is only proposing an accentuation of more of the same.

Markets operate under supply and demand. For example, if demand (the public) wants to buy a certain product, then suppliers will rush to meet that need. Current suppliers will increase production and/or other suppliers may enter that business.

Over the decades as the federal government became a healthcare provider it needed a mechanism to limit its payment obligations for healthcare services. It did this in the form of licensure. If you are not a licensed provider, as it defines the term, then you are not eligible to be paid by it for services rendered. Unfortunately, this resulted in restricting supply even as a growing population was creating additional demand.

Therefore, higher prices were the end result. They can only lower prices by restricting demand (rationed care). Both are in conflict with market forces.

Furthermore, as the obligation to pay for healthcare service and the actual recipient of that healthcare service is widened, there is less accountability to ensure only necessary services are received as well as the corresponding responsibility to get the best price for those services. Really, each of us should buy our own healthcare policy. Then we would shop for the best deal, one that fits our needs and wants.

Lastly, the rights of the People are infringed as government takes more control for our individual health. It is a short step for the government to tell each of us what to eat and drink.

Remember what Thomas Jefferson said, “If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”

 

"Wrong-Way" Barack

In 1964 Jim Marshall, a professional football player with the Minnesota Vikings, scooped up a fumble and ran 66 yards - to the wrong end zone!

President Obama fancies himself to be like FDR – Big government, hurry-do-something-today policies making things worse. Wrong way, Barack.

The federal government did not create the States. The States created the federal government, with very specific and limited powers. Wrong way, Barack.

The Declaration of Independence has 27 complaints. Only one deals with taxes, while 26 regard an abuse of power. Washington’s power grab is out of control. Wrong-way Barack.

“Wrong-Way” Barack is obviously incompetent: Big spending. Stimulus (some of it delayed until right before 2010 elections, FDR’s old trick). Government Motors. Cap & trade deceit. Medicare/Social Security spending exceeding revenue. Now Government Healthcare? Wrong-way Barack.

Ben Franklin wrote about Obama (paraphrasing), “Here he comes with his flood of words, and his drop of common sense.” Everything “Wrong-Way” Barack is doing is only making things worse. His professorial thinking may be fine for the ivory tower of the university, but it does not line up with reality.

From the sovereignty of the individual to the avoidance of “entangling alliances” he is tearing down the nation’s heritage. Perhaps it is from being raised abroad, perhaps it was his parental upbringing, but he just doesn’t get understand America and the value placed on individual responsibility.

Thomas Jefferson said,” Let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the Constitution.” “Wrong-Way” Barack.

The first three words of the Constitution are, “We the People.” At the end of the day, when the People demand a change, it will be made. The People still have the power.

Read the writings of the Founding Fathers, of their faith in Jesus Christ and in the Common Sense of The Common Man.

It’s our country. We have the right. We have the power to renew the U.S.A.

   

Paid_For_By_Mel-TheCommonMan